Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Laura Siegemund vs Patricia Maria Tig Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Siegemund vs Tig analysis and find out who is favored!
Laura Siegemund vs Patricia Maria Tig Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Siegemund 3 - 1 Tig
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Siegemund has won 47.59% of points on their second serve, while Tig has won 41.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Siegemund, in recent form, has won 57.99% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tig has won 56.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.22% and 42.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Siegemund has saved 54.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tig has saved 46.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Siegemund has won 66.04% of matches played (W/L 35/ 18), with Tig winning 45.45% (W/L 15/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Siegemund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 339/ 181), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 125/ 120). Tig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 205/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Siegemund has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 72% of matches (W/L 18/ 7), where as Tig has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 4/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Siegemund winning 3 times and Tig being victorious 1 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Siegemund winning 6 and Tig winning 5. The last match between Siegemund and Tig was at the Japan Women's Open - Hiroshima, 11-09-2019, Second, Hard with Laura Siegemund getting the victory 6-2 5-7 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:24:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Siegemund and Tig have played a deciding set 3 times, with Siegemund winning 3 times and Tig 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Siegemund winning 0, and Tig 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Siegemund has played against opponents with an average rank of 184.42 while Tig has played against players with an average rank of 190.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Siegemund has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tig has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Siegemund has converted 49.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tig has converted 55.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
71
Rank
27
High
36
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
2
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
469
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
60% (516-347)
Career Total W/L
62% (328-201)
60% (18-12)
YTD W/L
55% (6-5)
$2,498,621
Career Prize Money
$584,816
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Laura Siegemund | Patricia Maria Tig |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 5 |
| Games Won | 53 | 49 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 23 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:24:21 | 2:24:21 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (217/307) | 62% (238/386) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (133/217) | 65% (154/238) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (52/90) | 45% (66/148) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 28% (16/58) | 44% (14/32) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (166/386) | 40% (122/307) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 5-7 7-5 |
Stats 
Laura Siegemund
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
77 of
115)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
115)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Laura Siegemund
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
82%
(
84 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Laura Siegemund | Patricia Maria Tig |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (18/12) | 55% (6/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (43/32) | 61% (14/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (371/332) | 51% (109/103) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 65% (11/6) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.58 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 60 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:12:6 | 2:2:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 156.67 | 110.27 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (1712/2273) | 55% (372/681) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (970/1712) | 62% (231/372) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (267/561) | 42% (130/309) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (160/324) | 59% (47/80) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1143/2373) | 49% (327/674) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (18/30) | 60% (6/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 53% (8/15) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 43% (14/6) | 0% (4/0) |
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Laura Siegemund
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Laura Siegemund
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
69 of
93)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Anna Blinkova
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
32 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Laura Siegemund
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
44%
(
24 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
82%
(
72 of
88)
1st Serve %
85%
(
77 of
91)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Julia Riera
77%
(
65 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Beatrice Ricci
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Patricia Maria Tig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Cristina Diaz Adrover
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
75%
(
79 of
105)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Eva Maria Ionescu
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Bianca Bulat
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Vanessa Georgiana Popa Teiusanu
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kristiana Sidorova
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Alexia Iulia Marginean
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Camilla Gennaro
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
44%
(
4 of
9)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
17%
(
1 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
19
Total Points Won
16
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Chiara Fornasieri
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Siegemund Vs Tig Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
